Editorial policy

Sources should be public, attributable, stable, and directly connected to the legal question. Weak or indirect sources may be counted with low confidence or not counted at all.

An opinion is linked to an answer choice based on the source's visible content. Ambiguous, under-contextualized, or purely political statements may be excluded or marked with lower confidence.

Automated tools may help find sources and suggest initial matches. Counted records should remain reviewable through source, excerpt, and classification information.

Corrections may be requested for misquotes, wrong classifications, unavailable sources, duplicate people, changed positions, or privacy risks.

Hukukça publishes to show source-linked views, not to advocate for them.